Category Archives: Arithmetic

Synthetic Division (for factorising and/or solving polynomials)

I use synthetic division to factorise polynomials with a degree greater than 2. For example, f(x)=x^3+2x^2-5x-6

It works best with monic polynomials but can be adapted to non-monic ones (see example below).

The only problem is that you need to find a root to start.

Try the factors of -6 i.e. (-1, 1, 2, -2, 3, -3, 6, -6)

f(-1)=(-1)^3+2(-1)^2-5(-1)-6=0

Hence, x=-1 is a root and (x+1) is a factor of the polynomial.

Set up as follows

Bring the first number down

Multiply by the root and place under the second co-efficient

Add down

Repeat the process

The numbers at the bottom (1, 1, -6) are the coefficients of the polynomial factor.

We now know x^3+2x^2-5x-6=(x+1)(x^2+x-6).

We can factorise the quadratic in the usual way.

x^2+x-6=(x+3)(x-2)

Hence x^3+2x^2-5x-6=(x+1)(x+3)(x-2).

Let’s try a non-monic example

Factorise 6x^4+39x^3+91x^2+89x+30

I know -2 is a root. Otherwise I would try the factors of 30.

Use synthetic division

Because this was non-monic we need to divide our new co-efficients (6, 27, 37, 15) by 6 (the co-efficient of the x^4 term)

x^3+\frac{9}{2}x^2+\frac{37}{6}+\frac{5}{2}

We now need to go again. I know that \frac{-3}{2} is a root and (2x+3) is a factor.

Our quadratic factor is x^2+3x+5/3, which is 3x^2+9x+5.

The quadratic factor doesn’t have integer factors so,

6x^4+39x^3+91x^2+89x+30=(x+2)(2x+3)(3x^2+9x+5)

I think this is much quicker than polynomial long division.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Factorising, Factorising, Fractions, Polynomials, Quadratic, Simplifying fractions, Solving Equations

Converting recurring (non-terminating) decimals to fractions

The easiest approach is to jump right in with some examples.

Example 1

Convert 0.\overline{5} to a fraction.

Let x=0.\overline{5}

(1)   \begin{equation*}x=0.\overline{5}\end{equation*}

(2)   \begin{equation*}10x=5.\overline{5}\end{equation*}

Subtract equation 1 from equation 2

    \begin{equation*}9x=5\end{equation}

Hence x=\frac{5}{9} so 0.\overline{5}=\frac{5}{9}

Example 2

Convert 0.\overline{12} to a fraction.

Let x=0.\overline{12}

(3)   \begin{equation*}x=0.\overline{12}\end{equation*}

(4)   \begin{equation*}100x=12.\overline{12}\end{equation*}

Subtract equation 3 from equation 4.

    \begin{equation*}99x=12\end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}x=\frac{12}{99}=\frac{4}{33}\end{equation}

Example 3

Convert 0.1\overline{23} to a fraction

Let x=0.1\overline{23}

(5)   \begin{equation*}x=0.1\overline{23}\end{equation*}

(6)   \begin{equation*}10x=1.\overline{23}\end{equation*}

(7)   \begin{equation*}1000x=123.\overline{23}\end{equation*}

Subtract equation 6 from equation 7

    \begin{equation*}990x=122\end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}x=\frac{122}{990}=\frac{61}{495}\end{equation}

Our aim is to manipulate the recurring decimal to create two numbers each which have only the repeated digits after the decimal point.

One more example.

Example 4

Convert 3.4\overline{56} to a fraction

Let x=3.4\overline{56}

If I multiply by 10, then I will have 34.\overline{56} – only repeated digits after the decimal point.

If I multiply by 1000, then I will have 3456.\overline{56}– only repeated digits after the decimal point.

So I get,

    \begin{equation*}990x=3422\end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}x=\frac{3422}{990}=3\frac{226}{495}\end{equation}

You can also use your Casio classpad to do the conversion. Although I think it is easier just to do it yourself.

Let’s think about example 4,

3.4\overline{56}=3.4+\frac{56}{1000}+\frac{56}{100000}+\frac{56}{10000000}+...

Which is

3.4+\frac{56}{1000\times 100^0}+\frac{56}{1000\times100^1}+\frac{56}{1000\times 100^2}...

3.4+\Sigma_{x=0}^\infty(\frac{56}{1000\times 100^x})

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arithmetic, Decimals, Fractions, Year 11 Specialist Mathematics

Perfect Squares

Find all of the positive integers that make the following expression a perfect square.

(1)   \begin{equation*}(x-10)(x+14)\end{equation*}

Let

    \begin{equation*}(x-10)(x+14)=n^2\end{equation}

where n is an integer.

Expand and simplify

    \begin{equation*}x^2+4x-140=n^2\end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}x^2-4x-n^2=140\end{equation}

Complete the square

    \begin{equation*}(x+2)^2-4-n^2=140\end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}(x+2)^2-n^2=144\end{equation}

Factorise (using difference of perfect squares)

    \begin{equation*}(x+2-n)(x+2+n)=144\end{equation}

Find all of the factors of 144

(1,144), (2, 72), (3, 48), (4, 36), (6, 24), (8, 18), (9, 16), (12, 12)

First pair,

    \begin{equation*}x+2-n=1 \tag {1} \end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}x+2+n=144 \tag {2} \end{equation}

2x=141

x must be an integer.

I then used a spreadsheet

Solved for the x values.

Hence the integers that make (x-10)(x+14) are perfect square are, 10, 11, 13, 18, and 35.

Let’s try another one,

(x-6)(x+14)

(2)   \begin{equation*}(x-6)(x+14)=n^2\end{equation*}

    \begin{equation*}(x^2+8x-84=n^2\end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}(x+4)^2-n^2=100\end{equation}

    \begin{equation*}(x+4-n)(x+4+n)=100\end{equation}

Factors of 100,

(1, 100), (2, 50), (4, 25), (5, 20), (10, 10)

So the possible integers are 6 and 22.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Arithmetic, Divisibility, Interesting Mathematics, Puzzles, Quadratic, Solving Equations

Cats and Dogs

In my town 10% of the dogs think they are cats and 10% of the cats think they are dogs. All the other cats and dogs are perfectly normal. When all the cats and dogs in my town were rounded up and subjected to a rigorous test, 20% of them thought they were cats. What percentage of them really were cats?
Hamilton Olympiad 2003 B4 – The Ultimate Mathematical Challenge

Let x be the number of cats and y be the number of dogs.
Then 0.9x+0.1y think they are cats.
But we also know 20% of the total think they are cats.
0.2(x+y)
Therefore, 0.9x+0.1y=0.2(x+y)
0.9x+0.1y=0.2x+0.2y
0.7x=0.1y
7x=y
Percentage of cats is \frac{x}{x+y}\times100
Substitute 7x for y
\frac{x}{x+7x}\times100=\frac{x}{8x}\times100=\frac{1}{8}\times100=12.5%
\therefore 12.5% of the animals are cats

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Arithmetic, Percentages, Simplifying fractions, UK Mathematics Challenge

Australian Mathematics Competition – Polynomial Question

I came across this question from the 2010 Senior Australian Mathematics Competition:

A polynomial f is given. All we know about it is that all its coefficients are non-negative integers, f(1)=6 and f(7)=3438. What is the value of f(3)

Australian Mathematics Competition 2006-2012

I thought ‘excellent, a somewhat hard polynomial question for my students’ and then I tried it. Now I know why only 1% of students got it correct.

As we don’t know the order of the polynomial, let

f(x)=a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+...+a_1x^1+a_0

We know all of the coefficients are greater than or equal to zero. We also know

f(1)=a_n+a_{n-1}+...+a+a_0=6

Which means that all of the coefficients are between zero and six

0\le{a_n}\le{6}

We have also been given f(7)

f(7)=7^na_n+7^{n-1}a_{n-1}+ ... +7a+1=3438

As all of the coefficients are between zero and six, this is 3438 written in base 7.

Let’s calculate a few powers of 7

Powers of 7
7^01
7^17
7^249
7^3343
7^42401
7^516807
As numbersAs Powers of 7
3438=1\times2401+10373438=1\times7^4+1037
1037=3\times343+81037=3\times7^3+8
8=1\times7+18=1\times7^1+1
1=1\times11=1\times7^0

Hence 3438 written in base 7 is 13011

Therefore f(x)=x^4+3x^3+x+1

f(3)=3^4+3\times3^3+3+1

f(3)=81+81+4

f(3)=166

I really like this question. I think it could work well as a class extension activity with a bit of scaffolding.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Number Bases, Polynomials

Fractions to decimals

People usually know some fractions as decimals, for example

    \[\frac{1}{4}=0.25\ \textnormal{or }\frac{4}{5}=0.8\]

And denominators that are powers of ten are also easy,

    \[\frac{47}{100}=0.47\ \textnormal{or }\frac{256}{1000}=0.256\]

But what if it is something else? One that you don’t know. For example,

    \[\frac{5}{12}\ \textnormal{or }\frac{15}{37}\]

I like to do these as a long division

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arithmetic, Decimals, Fractions

Divisibility Rules – Integers 1 to 10

I think it’s useful to knot the divisibility rules, at least up to ten. Although, let’s face it, 7 is a bit tricky.

Divisibility Rules pdf

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arithmetic, Divisibility